Matthew Lukin Smawfield

Temporal Equivalence Principle

A scalar-tensor framework for dynamical proper time, clock-network correlations, and synchronization holonomy

The Temporal Equivalence Principle proposes that proper time is a dynamical field. Its central claim is not that local relativity fails, but that proper-time accumulation and synchronization possess global structure that standard local, reciprocity-even tests are not designed to measure.

In TEP, matter and clocks couple to a causal metric governed by a scalar time field. The spatial and covariance structure of this field is called Temporal Topology; its locally active gradients are Temporal Shear. Local Lorentz invariance and locally measured c are preserved. The new observables are global: distance-structured clock correlations, environment-dependent rate effects, and residual synchronization holonomy around closed loops.

GR already predicts that clocks tick differently in different gravitational potentials. TEP asks whether, after standard GR redshift, Sagnac, Shapiro, Doppler, station-motion, and reference-frame effects are modeled and subtracted, reproducible residual structure remains in clock-rate covariance, Temporal Shear, or closed-loop synchronization.

The primary empirical programme tests this structure using global timing networks. GNSS analyses report distance-structured correlations in multi-center clock products, a 25-year CODE baseline, and raw RINEX-derived observables; satellite laser ranging provides an optical-domain consistency test. Astrophysical papers then test whether the same temporal-field structure organizes lensing, pulsars, Cepheids, wide binaries, and high-redshift galaxies.

All manuscripts, analysis code, derived outputs, and reproducibility instructions are released for open review. The next decisive steps are independent reproduction of the timing-network correlations, technology-independent clock and ranging tests, and direct closed-loop measurements of residual synchronization holonomy.

Start here: Key Concepts · Research Programme · Interactive Demo · Correlation Explorer · Replication Code · FAQ

Key Conceptual Framework

These three concepts define the operational core of TEP. Temporal Topology describes the clock-rate landscape, Temporal Shear describes its local gradient / slope, and Synchronization Holonomy gives the cleanest closed-loop experimental discriminator.

Temporal Topology → clock-rate landscape Temporal Shear → local gradient / slope Synchronization Holonomy → closed-loop test

Operationally, these are distinct observables: GNSS-style clock networks primarily probe covariance structure CΘ, local fifth-force or rate-sector tests probe the active gradient Σμ, and closed-loop timing tests probe non-exact synchronization transport.

Temporal Topology

The spatial pattern and covariance of clock-rate structure

Plain meaning: Temporal Topology is the large-scale pattern of how proper time accumulates, varies, and correlates across space. It is the "landscape" of clock-rate structure through which clocks, light signals, and gravitational-wave signals propagate.
Core notation:
Θ(x) ≡ ln A(ϕ(x))
CA(x,x′) = ⟨δ ln A(x) δ ln A(x′)⟩

Using the compact notation Θ = ln A:

CΘ(x,x′) = ⟨δΘ(x) δΘ(x′)⟩

Matter and clocks couple to the causal matter metric:

μν = A²(ϕ)gμν + B(ϕ)∇μϕ∇νϕ
Intuition: Imagine a landscape of proper-time accumulation. The hills and valleys are not variations in the local speed of light. They represent differences in how proper time accumulates between regions: clocks in different parts of the landscape can tick differently relative to one another, even though every local observer still measures light at the same invariant c. In TEP, the key question is whether any residual structure remains after standard GR timing effects are accounted for. Flat plateaus represent screened or saturated regimes; structured regions contain gradients and correlations between distant clocks.

The landscape picture is only an analogy; the formal objects are ln A, CA, and μν.

Temporal Shear

The locally active gradient of the conformal clock-rate field

Plain meaning: Temporal Shear is the locally active gradient, or slope, of the clock-rate landscape. Where the clock-rate field changes across space or time, clocks may experience differential drift, phase shifts, period biases, lensing-like residuals, or modified dynamical scaling, depending on the measurement channel.
Core notation:
Σμ ≡ ∇μ ln A(ϕ)

Using Θ ≡ ln A:

Σμ = ∇μΘ

In screened or effectively saturated regimes, the observable shear/source-charge sector is suppressed:

Σμobs = 𝒮Σ(ℰ)Σμ

with 𝒮Σ(ℰ) → 0 in locally screened regimes, where ℰ denotes environmental state.

Intuition: If Temporal Topology is the landscape, Temporal Shear is the slope. Flat plateaus have little observable shear; hills, valleys, and transition regions have gradients. Depending on the measurement channel, those gradients may appear as clock-network covariance, rate-sector biases, lensing-like residuals, or environmental transition morphology.
Why GW170817 constrains TEP without automatically ruling out the conformal sector GW170817-type observations strongly constrain differential photon–graviton propagation, especially any disformal cone tilt. In the conformal sector, however, electromagnetic and gravitational signals traversing the same path experience common-mode clock-rate structure rather than a large relative speed split. This does not remove PPN, equivalence-principle, clock-comparison, or source-screening constraints; it clarifies which TEP sectors those constraints apply to.
Synchronization Holonomy

A closed-loop clock test for non-exact temporal structure

Plain meaning: Synchronization holonomy is the cleanest direct test of non-integrable time transport: it asks whether clock synchronization returns to itself after being transported around a closed loop. If, after all standard GR effects are removed, the loop returns with a residual proper-time offset, then the temporal transport is non-integrable.
Core notation:
Hresid[C] ≡ ∮C(σ̃ − σGR)

Equivalently:

Hresid[C] = ∬S(dσ̃ − dσGR),  ∂S = C
Here C is the closed synchronization path, S is a spanning surface with boundary C, σ̃ is the matter-frame TEP synchronization-transport one-form, and σGR is the modeled GR synchronization-transport one-form.
Intuition: Temporal Topology describes the landscape. Temporal Shear describes the slope. Synchronization Holonomy tests whether clock synchronization closes after a full loop through that structure. If the loop closes after GR subtraction, Hresid = 0. If it does not, the residual offset is a direct experimental target.
GR terms subtracted:
  • Sagnac
  • Shapiro delay
  • gravitational redshift
  • station motion
  • clock-scale realization
  • reference-frame corrections
  • gravitomagnetic / Lense-Thirring effects
Key property: A conformal-only exact gradient cannot generate leading-order closed-loop holonomy by itself. In a smooth, single-valued, simply connected region:
C Σμ dxμ = ∮CμΘ dxμ = ∮C dΘ = 0
Thus conformal clock-rate gradients can produce local rate shifts, open-path timing effects, and spatial covariance, but they do not produce leading-order closed-loop holonomy on their own. A leading nonzero Hresid requires disformal coupling, non-metricity, or another non-exact transport structure.

Research Programme

A theory of dynamical time, tested across clocks, light, and astrophysical systems

Foundational framework, primary timing-network evidence, synthesis and scaling tests, candidate astrophysical applications, and direct holonomy and solar-system stress tests.

I. Foundations & Measurement Taxonomy

II. Earth-Scale Timing & Network Tests

Global Time Echoes: Raw RINEX Consistency Test

Global Time Echoes: Raw RINEX Consistency Test

This paper validates that distance-structured correlations in GNSS clocks exist in raw observations using broadcast ephemerides, not just precise products—strongly constraining precise-product processing artifacts. Broadcast ephemerides still contain control-segment information, so Satellite Lase...

Updated: 5 Jun 2026
v0.6 (Kathmandu) PDF
TEP-GNSS-MGEX: Held-Out Replication in the Public MGEX Combined-Clock Product
TEP-GNSS-MGEXDOI pending

TEP-GNSS-MGEX: Held-Out Replication in the Public MGEX Combined-Clock Product

The Temporal Equivalence Principle (TEP) predicts correlated phase-coherent disturbances in GNSS timekeeping with a spatial correlation length of order thousands of kilometres, an east–west anisotropy exceeding the north–south counterpart, coupling to Earth orbital velocity, and a preferred axis ...

Updated: 7 Jun 2026
v0.1 (Suva) PDF
Global Time Echoes: Interactive GNSS Demo
INTERACTIVE DEMO

Global Time Echoes: Interactive GNSS Demo

Visualize the reported distance-dependent coherence pattern and compare it with the null expectation used in the analysis. Explore the correlation decay directly in the browser.

Try it now →

III. Synthesis, Scaling & Cross-Regime Transfer

Global Time Echoes: Empirical Synthesis
TEP-GTEDOI pending

Global Time Echoes: Empirical Synthesis

Analysis of 25.3 years of GNSS timing data (2000–2025) reveals a persistent, distance-structured correlation in global atomic clock networks that tests an empirically untested assumption of general relativity: the global integrability of proper time. Examination of 165.2 million station pairs fro...

Updated: 5 Jun 2026
v0.5 (Singapore) PDF
Universal Critical Density: Cross-Scale Consistency of ρ_T

Universal Critical Density: Cross-Scale Consistency of ρ_T

Dark matter observations across cosmological scales exhibit a regularity: the characteristic radius at which Newtonian dynamics fails scales as R ∝ M^(1/3), implying a universal critical density ρ_T. This scaling appears in galaxy rotation curves (SPARC database), ultra-diffuse galaxies (DF2/DF4)...

Updated: 5 Jun 2026
v0.4 (New Delhi) PDF

IV. Astrophysical & Cosmological Phenomena

The Cepheid Bias: Resolving the Hubble Tension

The Cepheid Bias: Resolving the Hubble Tension

The Hubble Tension—the persistent 5σ discrepancy between local distance-ladder measurements (H₀ ≈ 73 km/s/Mpc) and early-universe CMB inference (H₀ = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc)—represents a significant challenge in precision cosmology. This study proposes that the tension arises from a systematic, envi...

Updated: 5 Jun 2026
v0.7 (Kingston upon Hull) PDF

V. Solar-System Dynamics & Holonomy

VI. Cosmological Modeling & Background

VII. Laboratory, Accelerator & Metrology

Temporal Equivalence Principle: A Sidereal Modulation Audit of LHC Luminosity Data
TEP-LHCDOI pending

Temporal Equivalence Principle: A Sidereal Modulation Audit of LHC Luminosity Data

This paper audits CERN LHC luminosity data for sidereal modulation predicted by the Temporal Equivalence Principle (TEP). Analyzing uncalibrated CMS Run 2 data and fill-level LHC SuperTable summaries, the pipeline tests for a sidereal residual beyond conventional mechanical tides and operational controls.

Updated: 7 Jun 2026
v0.1 (Hanoi) PDF
Local Temporal Topology and the Spatial Variance of Laboratory Gravitational Constants
TEP-NISTDOI pending

Local Temporal Topology and the Spatial Variance of Laboratory Gravitational Constants

The April 2026 NIST metrology publication reported a redetermination of the gravitational constant G at Gaithersburg, Maryland, using an identical torsion-balance geometry to the prior French BIPM setup. The new measurement reveals a systematic relative drop of 2.81×10⁻⁴ compared to the Sèvres ba...

Updated: 7 Jun 2026
v0.1 (Naivasha) PDF

VIII. Quantum Foundations & Kinematic Boundaries

TEP-KIN: Interaction and Measurement
TEP-KINDOI pending

TEP-KIN: Interaction and Measurement

In the unscreened regime of the Temporal Equivalence Principle, this paper proposes that virtual force carriers and statistical wavefunctions are tangent-limit descriptions of a deeper disformal geometry of the temporal field, governed by the coupling coefficient B(φ). In the screened limit, wher...

Updated: 7 Jun 2026
v0.1 (Kuala_Lumpur) PDF
TEP-QF: The Dirac Limit of Dynamical Proper Time
TEP-QFDOI pending

TEP-QF: The Dirac Limit of Dynamical Proper Time

Standard Quantum Field Theory and the Dirac equation are low-resolution, flat-frame tangent limits of a deeper dynamical proper-time phase transport governed by the Temporal Equivalence Principle (TEP). By treating proper time τ as a dynamical scalar field φ rather than a universal parameter, fiv...

Updated: 7 Jun 2026
v0.1 (Qatar) PDF

About this research

This research programme develops the Temporal Equivalence Principle as a theory in which time is a dynamical field. More precisely, TEP proposes that proper-time accumulation is governed by a scalar field coupled to the matter/clock metric. The central question is whether synchronization and proper-time comparison remain globally integrable after standard relativistic corrections are modeled and removed.

The framework is formulated as a covariant scalar-tensor theory with a gravitational metric and a matter/clock metric. Local physics remains Lorentz invariant. The new effects appear in global observables: distributed clock correlations, synchronization holonomy, Temporal Shear, and environment-dependent Temporal Shear recovery.

The primary empirical tests use GNSS because global navigation systems form a planetary-scale network of atomic clocks. The reported signal is a distance-structured correlation pattern with characteristic length λT≈4,200 km, seen in processed clock products, a 25-year longitudinal analysis, and raw RINEX-derived observables. Satellite laser ranging provides an optical-domain consistency check.

The astrophysical papers then test whether the same temporal-field structure organizes phenomena normally treated separately: lensing mass discrepancies, globular-cluster pulsar timing, Cepheid distance-ladder biases, JWST high-redshift anomalies, and Gaia wide-binary dynamics. These applications are not presented as independent proof of TEP, but as cross-regime tests of a common Temporal Topology / Temporal Shear framework.

All papers, code, and data products are released for open review. The clearest near-term tests are external reproduction of the timing-network correlations, multi-constellation checks, optical-clock or fiber-link experiments, non-GNSS timing systems, and closed-loop one-way synchronization holonomy.

Interactive Correlation Decay Explorer

This interactive visualization displays the reported exponential decay pattern across processed clock products and raw RINEX-derived observables. The dual axes compare phase alignment in processed clock products with magnitude-squared coherence in raw RINEX-derived observables. Although these quantities are measured on different scales, both exhibit distance-structured decay consistent with the Global Time Echoes timing-network result.

The dotted trend lines show averaged exponential fits with Temporal Topology correlation lengths λT ranging from 600–4,500 km and fit qualities R²=0.87–0.99. The flagship multi-center processed-clock analyses report several-thousand-kilometre scales. Shorter apparent scales in raw or reduced demonstrations are shown as consistency diagnostics, not as replacements for the primary λT estimate.

Open Science & Reproducibility

All manuscripts, analysis code, processing pipelines, derived outputs, and reproducibility notes are publicly available under open-source licenses. The analyses are not synthetic simulations: they are reproducible outputs of documented code applied to real public geodetic and astronomical datasets. The interpretation remains model-dependent and is explicitly open to external audit.

Independent replication by other research groups is the decisive next step. Researchers interested in replication may find Paper 1 (TEP-GNSS I) the most accessible entry point, using publicly available CODE/IGS/ESA clock products (compact .clk files). Paper 2 (TEP-GNSS II) extends this with 25 years of CODE clock data. Paper 3 (TEP-GNSS III) provides the most direct raw-data test via RINEX processing but requires more substantial computational resources. Feedback on methodology, interpretation, or potential collaboration is welcomed.

TEP

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP

Core repository containing the theoretical framework, mathematical models, and LaTeX source. Includes derivation scripts, figure generation code, and the full manuscript source.

TEP-GNSS

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-GNSS

Complete analysis pipeline for Paper 1 (TEP-GNSS I). Features multi-center cross-validation scripts, processing logs, JSON statistical outputs, and generated figures for correlation decay quantification.

CODE IGS ESA
21 steps 8-12 hrs ~10 GB

TEP-GNSS-II

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-GNSS-II

Research compendium for Paper 2 (TEP-GNSS II). Contains longitudinal analysis scripts, orbital coupling logs, CMB alignment data, and comprehensive JSON result files.

CODE JPL DE432s
8 steps 4-6 hrs ~25 GB

TEP-GNSS-RINEX

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-GNSS-RINEX

End-to-end pipeline for Paper 3 (TEP-GNSS III). Includes SPP processing scripts, raw RINEX analysis logs, consistency-test datasets, and resulting anisotropy figures from 1 billion samples.

IGS RINEX Multi-GNSS
15 steps 12-24 hrs ~100 GB

TEP-GL

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-GL

Codebase for Paper 4 (TEP-GL). Contains phantom mass modeling scripts, rotation curve data, analysis logs, and the Python notebooks used to generate manuscript figures.

TEP-GTE

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-GTE

Synthesis framework for Paper 5 (TEP-GTE). Includes integration scripts, cross-study correlation logs, consolidated JSON datasets, and summary figures demonstrating signal convergence.

TEP-UCD

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-UCD

Scaling analysis codebase for Paper 6 (TEP-UCD). Features saturation-density calculation scripts, scaling law verification logs, and figure generation for the universal critical density ρT model.

TEP-RBH

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-RBH

Analysis codebase for Paper 7 (TEP-RBH). Contains JWST NIRSpec data processing scripts, soliton wake modeling, line-profile decomposition tools, and visualization for the RBH-1 runaway black hole candidate analysis.

JWST NIRSpec Keck/LRIS van Dokkum et al.
12 scripts ~10-20 min ~600 MB

TEP-SLR

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-SLR

Complete analysis pipeline for Paper 8 (TEP-SLR). Includes SLR data parsers, residual computation logs, correlation analysis scripts, and final result figures.

CDDIS ILRS LAGEOS
6 steps 2-4 hrs ~5-10 GB

TEP-EXP

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-EXP

Codebase for Paper 9 (TEP-EXP). Methodological taxonomy of precision tests of general relativity, discriminating experiments, and analysis of which observables constrain conformal, disformal, local-gradient, clock-covariance, and synchronization-holonomy sectors.

TEP-COS

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-COS

Codebase for Paper 10, Suppressed Density Scaling in Globular Cluster Pulsars. Contains pulsar catalog compilation, field-control comparisons, cluster-density scaling tests, and adversarial dynamics checks.

ATNF CMC Pantheon+ SDSS MaNGA
26 steps ~3 min ~5 GB

TEP-H0

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-H0

Codebase for Paper 11 (TEP-H0). Includes SH0ES data processing, environment stratification, TEP correction optimization, and scripts testing whether an environment-dependent Cepheid correction can reduce the Hubble tension.

SH0ES Pantheon+ HyperLEDA TRGB OGLE-IV
12 steps ~15 min ~500 MB

TEP-JWST

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-JWST

Codebase for Paper 12 (TEP-JWST). JWST high-redshift galaxy analysis, isochrony axiom tests, temporal shear calculations, SUSPENSE survey kinematic comparisons, and star formation efficiency modelling.

JWST Archive UNCOVER JADES CEERS COSMOS-Web FRESCO
176+ steps 4-8 hrs ~5-10 GB

TEP-WB

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-WB

Codebase for Paper 13 (TEP-WB). Gaia DR3 wide-binary analysis, Temporal Shear recovery tests, disk/halo environmental ordering, and field-transition radius fitting.

Gaia DR3 RAVE APOGEE
14 steps 30-60 min ~2-5 GB

TEP-EFA

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-EFA

Codebase for Paper 15 (TEP-EFA). Analysis of twelve Earth gravity assist flybys within TEP framework, showing restricted TEP model favored over Null and Anderson empirical baseline through Temporal Topology screening and scalar force modeling.

DSN JPL NASA
42 steps ~4 min ~100 MB

TEP-J0437

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-J0437

Codebase for Paper 16 (TEP-J0437). Detection of non-zero Phase Closure in PSR J0437-4715 scintillation using 19,167 triplets, rejecting scalar-delay null hypothesis and demonstrating TEP-predicted synchronization holonomy.

Parkes PPTA MeerKAT
51 steps ~20 min ~44 GB

TEP-LLR

github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-LLR

Codebase for Paper 17 (TEP-LLR). Analysis of 26,207 INPOP19a LLR residuals detecting synodic Nordtvedt parameter η = -3.91 × 10⁻⁴ (6.94σ), supporting TEP's compactness-dependent Strong Equivalence Principle violation.

INPOP DE430 JPL
78 steps ~30 min ~425 MB

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Temporal Equivalence Principle (TEP)?

TEP is a scalar-tensor framework proposing that time is a dynamical field. More precisely, proper-time accumulation is governed by a scalar field coupled to the matter/clock metric, while local Lorentz invariance and locally measured c are preserved.

How does TEP differ from general relativity?

TEP is proposed as a generalization of GR, not a simple replacement. GR is recovered to current experimental precision where the locally observable shear/source-charge sector is screened or saturated. Differences are expected in global or weakly screened observables: distributed clock correlations, closed-loop synchronization holonomy, and environment-dependent rate or screening transitions.

Is this just gravitational time dilation renamed?

No. GR already predicts gravitational time dilation: clocks tick differently in different gravitational potentials. TEP accepts that and does not claim it as new. The proposed new physics is residual structure after the standard GR timing model is removed: distance-structured clock covariance, environment-dependent Temporal Shear, and possible closed-loop synchronization holonomy.

What evidence motivates TEP?

TEP is first a theoretical framework, but the strongest empirical motivation is the timing-network programme. The astrophysical papers are transfer tests and candidate applications.

How does TEP reinterpret dark matter observations?

TEP does not deny the lensing, timing, dynamical, or cosmological phenomena usually attributed to dark matter. It challenges the assumption that those phenomena uniquely require a new invisible particulate substance. Temporal-field gradients and nontrivial proper-time transport can project into lensing, timing, and dynamical inference as an apparent mass-like component, termed Phantom Mass.

In the conservative interpretation, this is a testable correction to time-domain and variability-dependent lensing observables. In the stronger interpretation, tested across the series, part of the dark-sector phenomenology may be temporal in origin: an effect of analyzing a universe with nontrivial time transport under the assumption of global isochrony.

How does TEP address the Hubble tension?

TEP predicts that Cepheid periods may acquire an environment-dependent bias in deep gravitational potentials. In the current SH0ES-host analysis, correcting for this proposed bias shifts the inferred local value toward the Planck value. This should be read as a candidate distance-ladder systematic, not as a final resolution until tested blindly on independent Cepheid, TRGB, maser, and SN host samples.

Is TEP compatible with gravitational wave observations?

Yes, in the intended parameter regime. GW170817 tightly constrains differential photon–graviton propagation: any disformal cone tilt must be extremely small. TEP's main conformal-sector effects are different. If electromagnetic and gravitational signals travel along the same path through the same conformal temporal landscape, the effect is common-mode rather than a photon–graviton speed split. Conformal sectors remain indirectly constrained by PPN, equivalence-principle, source-screening, redshift, and clock-comparison tests.

What would test or falsify TEP?

The most direct falsifier is demonstrating that the reported GNSS covariance structure is fully reproduced by a known satellite, station-network, ephemeris, clock-product, or environmental systematic with the same distance, direction, and time dependence. Beyond this, the framework is designed to be tested through several increasingly independent pathways:

  1. Independent GNSS replication: Reproducing the reported timing correlations using independent processing of public IGS/CODE clock products.
  2. Raw-data robustness: Testing whether the timing signal persists when derived directly from raw RINEX observations using multiple GNSS processing engines (e.g., GIPSY, Bernese).
  3. Technology independence: Verifying if similar spatial-temporal structure is detectable via Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR), fiber-optic time transfer, or optical-clock networks.
  4. Closed-loop holonomy: Performing dedicated multi-leg timing experiments to search for residual synchronization holonomy after standard GR effects are removed.
  5. Screening morphology: Testing whether the predicted environment-dependent ordering persists in wide-binary, globular cluster, and galaxy-scale data.
  6. Astrophysical inheritance: Determining if the framework fails when timing-calibrated parameters are applied to lensing and cosmological observables without additional free parameters.

Does TEP claim GNSS is wrong?

No. GNSS works extraordinarily well. TEP does not claim navigation is failing. It asks whether residual clock-network covariance, after standard modeling and differencing, contains spatial structure normally treated as noise, covariance, or processing residual. The claim is about subdominant correlation structure, not operational GNSS accuracy.

How does TEP relate to MOND?

Both TEP and MOND address phenomenology attributed to dark matter, but through distinct mechanisms. MOND proposes a universal acceleration threshold (a₀ ≈ 1.2×10⁻¹⁰ m/s²) below which gravitational behavior deviates from Newtonian predictions. TEP instead tests environment-dependent Temporal Shear recovery organized around the Temporal Topology saturation scale ρT ≈ 20 g/cm3, which produces environmental ordering that differs from the MOND/EFE parameterizations tested in the wide-binary analysis. The two frameworks make qualitatively different predictions for environmental stratification.

Where can I find the TEP papers, data, and analysis code?

The full manuscript series is freely available at mlsmawfield.com with Zenodo DOIs. Analysis code and data pipelines are hosted on GitHub. All manuscripts, code, and data products are released under Creative Commons CC-BY-4.0 and MIT licenses.

Note on Disambiguation: The acronym TEP (Temporal Equivalence Principle) addresses the foundations of spacetime geometry. It is distinct from the thermoelectric power coefficient (Seebeck TEP) in condensed matter, the Total Extraperitoneal surgical procedure, or Thermal Expansion and Properties in engineering.